The Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Animals of Germany

Animals in Captivity - 659 Words

Animals in Captivity Are zoos cruel to animals? Within the United States of America there are known of at least â€Å"three hundred and fifty zoos† that are still active (Zoo Stats.). Zoos contain animals such as elephants, lions, tigers, giraffes, penguins, and gorillas which are placed in cages for human observation and studies. This type of close up observation and interactions can help benefit humans however, can cause harm to the animals mentally and physically due to human input in changing animal routines (PETA). For example, animals living in zoos do not have to compete for food, territory, mates, or dominance which basically constructs them to lose their wildlife survival instincts and abilities. We should consider having more national parks than zoos because this action of taking wild animals from their wild habitats and placing them behind in cages is cruel. The loss of survival instincts and abilities in wild animals are sometimes cause by human interactions such a s placing them in zoos. When animals are in zoos they are fed daily without any struggle or awareness like animals in the wild. For example, lions in captivity do not have to compete as aggressively as they would in the wild because, humans are providing such significant participation when giving out food and water out effortlessly. This takes away the survival skills such as â€Å"effectively hunting and dominance† in the wild because whether big or small the lion will get something to eat (PETA). Due toShow MoreRelatedAnimals In Captivity2002 Words   |  9 PagesAnimals In Captivity Wild animals are known as â€Å"wild† animals for a purpose. If wild animals were intended to be kept shut up in a jail, also known as a zoo, then what exactly is the point of contacting them wild animals anymore? Zoo authorities use many justifications to back up their place that having wild animals in captivity is necessary, but those justifications are neither moral nor necessary enough reasons to deny animals of their organic right to independence. Even under the best of conditionsRead MoreAnimal And The Presentation Of Captivity1409 Words   |  6 PagesThe panthers advocate, our observatory narrator, acts almost as a conduit. The title gives implications of a third person narrative, yet Rilke channels the animals emotional state also, affirming how â€Å"He feels†¦Ã¢â‚¬ .The speakers attempt to steal the â€Å"gaze† of the restrained feline’s â€Å"misted† vision, is convincing. Although misted, we are given a clear insight, of the monotonou s and bound lifestyle of the undomesticated cat. We are informed that the panther is so powerless behind the bars, to the pointRead MoreThe Captivity Of Wild Animals1705 Words   |  7 PagesThe captivity of wild animals has been a highly debated topic for many years. Zoos and aquariums are huge attractions and can be found all over the world. Movies such as Black Fish and Unlocking the Cage showcase some of the troubling behaviors animals in captivity portray. Advocates for animal rights can use these movies to push their agenda and people who oppose these films say they are forms of propaganda. The fact of the matter is that it does not matter what side of the argument that you areRead MoreEssay on Animals in Captivity2418 Words   |  10 Pages They laugh and smile as they watch the animals at the zoo sleep. What these children do not realize is that these animals are dying on the inside. Animals that live at the zoo are extremely depressed. These animals can suffer severe psy chological disorders from being out of their natural environment. But others argue that keeping these animals in captivity will help keep endangered species alive. However, the disadvantages of keeping animals in captivity are becoming more and more serious, and moreRead MoreAnimals Should Not Be Held Captivity1588 Words   |  7 PagesJennifer Smith McGowen English 4 20 October 2017 Animals Should Not Be Held in Captivity Animal captivity has been an ongoing debate for over 60 years. There should be no question about whether animal captivity is wrong. â€Å"Hundreds of thousands of wild animals across the world are snatched from natural habitats, forced into captivity and subjected to abuse, both mentally and physically, in the name of entertainment and profit.† (World Animal Protection 1) Places such as the circus use abusive trainingRead MoreAnimals Should Not Be Held Captivity1590 Words   |  7 PagesSmith McGowen English 4 20 October 2017 Rough Draft Animals Should Not Be Held in Captivity Animal captivity has been an ongoing debate for over 60 years. There should be no question about whether animal captivity is wrong. â€Å"Hundreds of thousands of wild animals across the world are snatched from natural habitats, forced into captivity and subjected to abuse, both mentally and physically, in the name of entertainment and profit.† (World Animal Protection 1) Places such as the circus use abusiveRead MoreAnimals Should Not Be Held Captivity1560 Words   |  7 PagesAnimals are often prevented from doing most of the activities that are natural to them, like roaming, choosing a partner, and being with others of their own kind. Animals that live under human care are in captivity. Captivity is the keeping of either domesticated animals or wild animals. There are multiple arenas that teach people that it is acceptable to interfere with animals and keep them locked in captivity, where they are cramped, lonely, and far from their natural homes. Deprived of the opportunityRead MoreKeeping Animals Captivity Is Not An Option1962 Words   |  8 PagesName: Instructor: Course: Date: Keeping Animals in Captivity Is Not an Option There is almost no place on the Earth, not known to the human being, which convinces people of their power over the nature. Most of the household animals were domesticated a long time ago, in the times of Neolithic era. Society has gone far beyond the usual understanding of the treatment of animals. Which of them we should keep our distance from and which just need to be held in captivity? Which of them would require humanRead MoreWild Animals Should NOT Be Kept in Captivity2736 Words   |  11 Pagesour planet. As humans, and the superior species on Earth, we put exotic animals, aquatic and terrestrial, in zoos or aquariums where people can go to see them to learn more about them in order to protect them. It just so happens that by putting these animals into captivity, we are causing more damage to them, just as damage is occurring in the wild and more species are becoming extinct. Animals should not be held in captivity; it does not save them from going extinct, but helps kill th em off. TheRead MoreLife Experience of Sea Animals in Captivity2053 Words   |  9 Pagesin the air on command by whistle. These tricks draw guests into the park. What may seem to be fun for the viewer, is torture for the mammals. There is a deadly truth behind all sea mammals in captivity: they don’t survive well there. Though sea mammals provide entertainment, they do not belong in captivity. Imagine being at home and then somebody broke in and you were forced, without any choice, to join the circus. This is what the mammals have to go through every day. It is not fair for the mammals

Brandywine Battlefield Park Free Essays

Brandywine Battlefield is considered as one historical park under Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission in cooperation with the Brandywine Battlefield Historic Site Associates. It is located on 50 acres near Chadds Ford, Delaware County, Pennsylvania. The history of Battle of Brandywine on September 11, 1777 during the American revolution takes place here and it was a major victory for the British where they have succeeded in capturing Philadelphia. We will write a custom essay sample on Brandywine Battlefield Park or any similar topic only for you Order Now In 1949, This battlefield was established as a Pennsylvania State park. it is open to the public from 9 in the morning up to 4 in the afternoon from Tuesday to Saturday and on Sundays from12 noon to 4 in the afternoon. Talking about the geographical location of the battlefield park, it is on the banks of Brandywine creek   in southeastern Pennsylvania. Since it is near Philadelphia it led directly to the land where the major battle of American revolution takes place. the creek is one major obstacle and serves as a moat that blocks the British access to the Schuylkill River and the Continental Congress both in Philadelphia. It is also the crossroads of the Thirteen colonies. The road control was crucial to both supplies of British and Continental armies. In the park you will see reenactors who portrays Hessian mercenaries, quaker farmers and British and continental soldiers during special events in the park. staffs and volunteers from the park provides daily tour visit to tourist about the battlefield and the park. hands on activities are also given to visitors as well as speeches and seminar sponsorships. Much of the park and battlefield is preserved. it is tagged as a National Historical Landmark designated by the United States Congress   20 years after the Battle of Brandywine it was inaugurated in the year 1997. (Webster, 2007) As you tour around the park you will see various pictures and even actual proofs that these park was once a site of a thriving farming community before the battle. there are homes of quaker farmers which has been restored tot heir 1777 appearance and can e viewed by everyone inside. The headquarter used by George Washington before and after the battle is also located in the park and the name of the structure is The Benjamin Ring House. Inside the house there are collections of quaker style furniture with detailed historical information about the battle and the period of stay of Washington in the house. the house has an easy access of Chadds Ford where the British were expected to cross the river. inside this house, Washington held a council of war with his generals and plans their strategies. It was also burnt out on September 16, 1931 and was already restored to its original 1777 look. Inside the Benjamin ring, is one fulling mill and one grist mill. the house is named after Mr. Benjamin ring who is considered as the most prominent businessman in the township. On the opposite side of the park, the Gideon Glipin House is located and this house is also restored and furnished with vintages of Quaker furniture. Marquis   de Lafayette base operations was set here before and during the battle. The visitors center inside the park has a Museum where the Battle of Brandywine and the American Revolution is presented as part of the modernization of the park to entertain visitors and give them more knowledge about he important event that happened in the said place. there is also a   permanent interpretive exhibit and an audio video presentation of graphics that tells the story of the battle and its relation to the campaign in Philadelphia in 1777.   the museum contains artifacts and explanations that gave more emphasis about the Battle of Brandywine Brandywine Battlefield Historical park is easy to access for tourist and history lovers. outdoor picnic facilities are also available.   Restrooms, and park offices for reservations are also found where friendly park personnels can be found for further assistance during your visits. There are also gift shops and souvenir shops inside the park. The Battlefield Park brings the action to life through authentic displays amid the hauntingly beautiful and tranquil rolling, wooded hills not far from where the battle was fought. Work Cited Webster, Nancy V. A Commonwealth Treasure: Brandywine Battlefield Park. Pennsylvania Heritage Magazine, February 12, 2007 How to cite Brandywine Battlefield Park, Papers Brandywine Battlefield Park Free Essays Brandywine Battlefield is considered as one historical park under Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission in cooperation with the Brandywine Battlefield Historic Site Associates. It is located on 50 acres near Chadds Ford, Delaware County, Pennsylvania. The history of Battle of Brandywine on September 11, 1777 during the American revolution takes place here and it was a major victory for the British where they have succeeded in capturing Philadelphia. We will write a custom essay sample on Brandywine Battlefield Park or any similar topic only for you Order Now In 1949, This battlefield was established as a Pennsylvania State park. it is open to the public from 9 in the morning up to 4 in the afternoon from Tuesday to Saturday and on Sundays from12 noon to 4 in the afternoon. Talking about the geographical location of the battlefield park, it is on the banks of Brandywine creek   in southeastern Pennsylvania. Since it is near Philadelphia it led directly to the land where the major battle of American revolution takes place. The creek is one major obstacle and serves as a moat that blocks the British access to the Schuylkill River and the Continental Congress both in Philadelphia. it is also the crossroads of the Thirteen colonies. The road control was crucial to both supplies of British and Continental armies. In the park you will see reenactors who portrays Hessian mercenaries, quaker farmers and British and continental soldiers during special events in the park. staffs and volunteers from the park provides daily tour visit to tourist about the battlefield and the park. hands on activities are also given to visitors as well as speeches and seminar sponsorships. Much of the park and battlefield is preserved. it is tagged as a National Historical Landmark designated by the United States Congress   20 years after the Battle of Brandywine it was inaugurated in the year 1997. (Webster, 2007) As you tour around the park you will see various pictures and even actual proofs that these park was once a site of a thriving farming community before the battle. there are homes of quaker farmers which has been restored tot heir 1777 appearance and can e viewed by everyone inside. The headquarter used by George Washington before and after the battle is also located in the park and the name of the structure is The Benjamin Ring House. Inside the house there are collections of quaker style furniture with detailed historical information about the battle and the period of stay of Washington in the house. the house has an easy access of Chadds Ford where the British were expected to cross the river. Inside this house, Washington held a council of war with his generals and plans their strategies. It was also burnt out on September 16, 1931 and was already restored to its original 1777 look. Inside the Benjamin ring, is one fulling mill and one grist mill. the house is named after Mr. Benjamin ring who is considered as the most prominent businessman in the township. On the opposite side of the park, the Gideon Glipin House is located and this house is also restored and furnished with vintages of Quaker furniture. Marquis   de Lafayette base operations was set here before and during the battle. The visitors center inside the park has a Museum where the Battle of Brandywine and the American Revolution is presented as part of the modernization of the park to entertain visitors and give them more knowledge about he important event that happened in the said place. there is also a   permanent interpretive exhibit and an audio video presentation of graphics that tells the story of the battle and its relation to the campaign in Philadelphia in 1777.   the museum contains artifacts and explanations that gave more emphasis about the Battle of Brandywine Brandywine Battlefield Historical park is easy to access for tourist and history lovers. outdoor picnic facilities are also available.   Restrooms, and park offices for reservations are also found where friendly park personnels can be found for further assistance during your visits. There are also gift shops and souvenir shops inside the park. The Battlefield Park brings the action to life through authentic displays amid the hauntingly beautiful and tranquil rolling, wooded hills not far from where the battle was fought. Work Cited Webster, Nancy V. A Commonwealth Treasure: Brandywine Battlefield Park. Pennsylvania Heritage Magazine, February 12, 2007 How to cite Brandywine Battlefield Park, Papers

Business law Competition of Busineessn Procuct

Question: Describe about the Business law for /Competition of Busineessn Procuct. Answer: 1. As per the given study, Bill and Jill intended to purchase a cafe on 1st July 2016 from the Dodgy Pty. Ltd. Therefore, the offer was made from behalf of Bill and Jill to the Dodgy Pty. Ltd. There exists an offer in the contract made between the two parties. The ownership of the cafe was obtained as the offer was made keeping certain considerations and terms in the offer. There exists acceptance of the offer in the present case. Thus, opinion can be made that the contract between Bill and Jill along with Dodgy Pty. ltd is a valid contract as there was consideration made followed with acceptance of the offer. Nevertheless, the case focuses on another added factor that is worth the discussion. As per the law, a contract can be considered void or illegal, if there is deceptive or misconduct present, certain specific matters are misinterpreted and the conduct is unconscionable in nature. In the given case, the Dodgy Pty. Ltd had cheated the other party by dishonestly stating that the weekly takings of the cafe is $ 10,000. The estimated cost of the business was stated to be $3000 per week. However, while continuing the business, Bill and Jill came to know that the weekly taking was about $2000 on an average that as lower that their cost. Therefore, it can be inferred that there has been a misinterpretation of the terms and conditions of the contract made between Bill and Jill and the Dodgy Pty. Ltd. There is a need for the plaintiff to enter as misinterpretation of contracts signifies false statement. Three elements are useful in establishing the misinterpretation of contract. The three type s of misinterpretation are negligent, fraudulent and innocent misinterpretation. Fraudulent misinterpretation can be termed as that statement that is undertaken with the intention to mislead the plaintiff fraudulent interpretation and simultaneously remain ignorant about the truth. The given case indicates that a fraudulent interpretation has been carried out as Dodgy Pty. ltd provided Bill and Jill with a false statement that was done intentionally. The false statement regarding the weekly takings and the cost of the business is a fraudulent misinterpretation carried out by Dodgy Pty. Ltd. The Australia Consumer Law, Chapter 2 and section 18 (1) states that ambiguous or unreliable contract with a party in a contract is strictly prohibited. On addition, the misinterpretation or false statement about goods and services are even prohibited by the Australian Consumer Law Section 29. The section of the act allows the sufferer to claim penalty from the defendants (Austlii.edu.au. 2015). Bill and Jill is therefore eligible for claiming for the damaged they suffered from Dodgy Pty. Ltd. or the contract will be considered as an inexistent. A person can be changed guilty if as per the Misrepresentation Act 1972 Part 2, the person wrongly interprets the contract. In this case, the corporate body is responsible for the offense to which Jill and Bill are entitled. The corporations are restricted from conducting any sort of misleading act or deceiving act by the Trade Practices Act 1794 Section 52 (Martinluitingh.com. 2014). Thus, Bill and Jill are allowed to claim the loss and damages they suffered from the contract. On the other hand, Dodgy Pty. Ltd is responsible for paying for the damages to Bill and Jill based on the Fair trade Act 1987 Section 56. This law also with the misleading conduct that restricts performing misleading act while conducting trade or business with other parties. 2. As per the given case, the pizza business is running successfully that is owned by Hugh. Since, Hugh intended to trim down the operating cost of the business devoid of carrying out listing of the papers, they used to advertise the business, and a serious issue came up. The company faced issues as they offered stale and outdated ingredients in the food products they sold although the company advertised and claimed to use only fresh ingredients. A number of customers were reported to fall sick while one of them died out of serious food poisoning. Based on the above issues, there are several number of laws related to these issues. The government and the customers are allowed to take significant legal action on the company that is found guilty on this context. As the business owner had no registration of the documents, yet the advertising process is carried out makes the business owner guilty under the law of Business Names Registration Act 2011 Part 2 and Section 18 (Divanbeigi and R amalho 2015). As per this act, it can be stated that it is a serious offense to carry out business in an unregistered manner. section 18 (1) of the act specially stresses that if a trade runs on a name that is unregistered in the register of Business names, then it is a crime and the owner can be punished for the act. The penalty unit is $ 110, which is one of the 30 penalty units considered in the act (Legislation.nsw.gov.au. 2016). As the owner of the business, advertises UberPizzaDelivery service without registering its documents with the law, makes the person offensive under the Business Names Registration Act 2011 Part 2 and Section 18 (Legislation.gov.au. 2014). The Food Safety and Standards can also be considered appropriate for the given case and the Food Act of 2003 and Food Regulation act 2015 are associated with the issue. Under the Food Act of 2013, the business owner is guilty as he uses stale and unfit ingredients that cause the consumers to fall ill. Selling of unsafe food is a serious offense under the part 2 and section 14 of the act. The section restricts the sellers from selling food products in the market that are unfit for the consumption. As Hugh was selling stale and un-fresh food to the customers, he is liable as per the act. Hugh might have to suffer from two years of imprisonment or a penalization of 1000 penalty units ir even both if the customers suffering from poor health owing to the food value, takes action with the help of the act. According to section 14 (2), as the owner was quite aware of the use of unsafe ingredients into the food production, makes him answerable (Austlii.edu.au. 2016). The section states that s elling food even after knowing that the food is unsafe is a crime. In case of a corporate, a penalty of 3750 punishment units can be charged if found guilty and seven fifty fine units when an individual is found guilty. Moreover, under the section 15 of Food act in 2003, Hugh is responsible as it offers stale and outdated ingredients even though it advertises using fresh ingredients. The act deals with the delivery of counterfeit food report through promotion. Section 15 (1) and (2) of the food act 2003, that if an entity have partial or complete knowledge about the fact that the customers are relied on the description of food given by the owner and might face health issues from the consumption of such food and yet provides fake description can be severely punished. An imprisonment of up to two years or 1000 punishment units or equally can be charged on the business owner, if found guilty. Under the Food Regulations Act 2015 Part 2 Clause 8, the customers are able to take legal action Hugh as the person has been carrying out business that is not registered. Under the Australian Consumer Law (194), the distressed party can take actions. As per the law, if an offers goods that are against the safety standards it is an offence and legal actions can be taken against the supplier. The individual found guilty is liable to pay $220000 while the corporate needs to pay an amount of $1100000 (Austlii.edu.au. 2015). Hugh is liable to pay the customers for their loss and damages, as he is found guilty under the personal liability as well as the vicarious liability for ignoring the duty of being carefull. The consumers have the power to take the person to court that might end up closing down of the business completely (Kitagawa 2015). In the given case, the fraudulent misinterpretation have taken place as a false description about the products are delivered to the customers to make the customers interested in buying the products. Therefore, under the Australian Consumer Law Section 29, the owner of the pizza business needs to face a pecuniary penalty paid to the customers. An example of the huge false representation made by the business is ACCC v Giraffe World Australia Pty Ltd (1999). References Austlii.edu.au. (2015). COMPETITION AND CONSUMER ACT 2010 - SCHEDULE 2The Australian Consumer Law. [online] Available at: https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/caca2010265/sch2.html [Accessed 15 Sep. 2016]. Austlii.edu.au. (2015). MISREPRESENTATION ACT 1972. [online] Available at: https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/sa/consol_act/ma1972224/ [Accessed 15 Sep. 2016]. Austlii.edu.au. (2016). TRADE PRACTICES ACT 1974 No. 51, 1974 - SECT 52Misleading or deceptive conduct.. [online] Available at: https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/num_act/tpa1974149/s52.html [Accessed 15 Sep. 2016]. Australiancontractlaw.com. (2016). Australian Contract Law | Julie Clarke. [online] Available at: https://www.australiancontractlaw.com/legislation/cthacl.html [Accessed 15 Sep. 2016]. Divanbeigi, R. and Ramalho, R., 2015. Business regulations and growth.World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (7299). Kitagawa, Z., 2015.Administrative Regulations(Vol. 4). Doing Business in Japan. Legislation.gov.au. (2014). Business Names Registration Act 2011. [online] Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2011A00126/ [Accessed 15 Sep. 2016]. Legislation.nsw.gov.au. (2016). NSW Legislation. [online] Available at: https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/act/2003/43/part2 [Accessed 15 Sep. 2016]. Martinluitingh.com. (2014). Trade Practices Act - Martin Luitingh Barrister. [online] Available at: https://www.martinluitingh.com/trade-practices-act.html [Accessed 15 Sep. 2016].